When an insurance claim involves building damage, the assessment process is rarely straightforward. There are often questions about the cause, extent and timing of the damage—as well as whether the building met relevant codes or was already showing signs of deterioration. These complexities can lead to delays, disputes, or claim denials, even when the damage seems obvious to the policyholder.
Building consultancy services play a critical role in resolving these challenges. By providing clear, independent reporting and technical insight, building and structural consultants help insurers, brokers and property owners navigate the claims process with greater clarity and confidence.
Why claims are commonly denied in building-related insurance matters
Claim denials are not issued without reason. In most cases, they reflect gaps in information, uncertainty about the cause of damage, or issues with the condition or compliance of the building. Understanding the common reasons claims are denied can help prevent avoidable disputes and delays.
1. Insufficient or unclear evidence
One of the most frequent reasons a claim is denied is a lack of credible evidence. This might include:
- No professional assessment of the damage
- Inadequate documentation of the condition before and after the event
- Confusion around whether damage is new or pre-existing.
Without reliable, independent information, insurers may be unable to confirm that a claim is valid.
2. Damage not covered by the policy
Even when damage is present, it may fall outside the scope of what the policy covers. Common exclusions include:
- General wear and tear
- Poor maintenance or gradual deterioration
- Design or construction defects.
A claim for structural cracking, for example, may be denied if it’s linked to long-term settlement rather than a sudden event like a storm.
If the underlying cause isn’t clearly established, insurers may determine that the event doesn’t meet the policy’s requirements.
3. Non-compliance with building codes or regulations
Damage linked to non-compliant building work—such as unauthorised extensions, structural alterations, or outdated materials—can also lead to a claim being denied. If a building didn’t meet the required standards at the time of the event, insurers may argue that the damage was avoidable or foreseeable.
4. Disputes over causation
Establishing what caused the damage is often the most contested part of a claim. For example:
- Did the cracking result from storm movement or underlying soil conditions?
- Was water ingress due to recent weather or long-term construction defects?
Without specialist input, these questions are difficult to resolve. As a result, insurers may deny claims based on a lack of conclusive evidence.
How building consultancy services support better claim outcomes
When a claim is at risk of denial—or already has been—engaging independent experts can make all the difference. Building consultancy services help clarify the technical details behind a claim, resolve uncertainty, and provide insurers with the evidence needed to make fair, defensible decisions.
By drawing on the expertise of building and structural consultants, insurers and brokers are better equipped to address the specific issues that commonly lead to claim denials.
Independent reporting that insurers can rely on
One of the most valuable contributions of a building consultancy is an objective, evidence-based report. These reports:
- Investigate the cause and extent of the damage
- Document conditions in line with industry standards
- Present findings in a format suitable for insurers and legal review if required.
This helps strengthen the quality of information submitted with the claim, reducing ambiguity and supporting faster resolution.
Clarifying compliance issues
Technical expertise is essential when policy decisions hinge on whether a building met relevant codes or was built to standard. Building and structural consultants can:
- Review construction quality and adherence to codes
- Identify unauthorised works or outdated materials
- Help determine whether the damage was foreseeable or preventable.
This insight helps insurers assess liability and make informed decisions, particularly where compliance questions are in play.
Resolving disputes over causation
Disagreements about what caused the damage are common—but not always insurmountable. Building consultants apply forensic investigation methods to isolate the cause, whether it’s structural movement, water ingress, foundation failure or external impact. Their ability to provide a defensible view on causation gives insurers and brokers a firmer basis to negotiate outcomes and resolve conflicts.
Bridging technical and insurance conversations
Building damage often involves highly technical findings that can be difficult to translate into insurance language. Consultants act as a bridge between the technical world and the claims process—ensuring that all parties understand the implications of the findings and can communicate effectively.
This helps prevent confusion, manage expectations, and support collaboration between insurers, brokers and property owners.
The takeaway
Insurance claim denials are often the result of information gaps—not ill intent. But for those involved, the outcome can be frustrating, costly and difficult to navigate.
Engaging an experienced building consultancy, like Morse Building Consultancy, helps to fill information gaps—offering clarity, evidence and expert analysis that supports both policyholders and insurers in reaching a fair and accurate outcome.
Need clarity on a complex claim?
We’re here to help. Contact us today to speak with our team.